Yet, at least when it comes to journalism, that’s not the case, according to recent research from the Brookings Institution.
“People [are] consuming journalism digitally like long stories … even on their mobile phones,” Tom Rosenstiel -- a nonresident senior fellow at Brookings, and executive director of the American Press Institute -- writes in the report.
In fact, “long form” stories -- those averaging 1,200 words -- drive 23% more engagement in the API’s new interest index. Additionally, longer stories lift various other metrics like page views (by 11%), sharing (by 45%) and reading time (by 36%).
Even on their handheld gadgets, “People like quality and depth, and will stick with a well-told story,” according to Rosenstiel.
Not so surprisingly, Rosenstiel and his colleagues found that pictures go a long way toward boosting engagement. Stories presented with a photo score 19% higher in engagement than stories without, while stories with multiple photos score 43% higher engagement levels.
Even more impressive, adding audio or video to stories correlates with 36% more overall engagement, 81% more views, and 84% more shares.
Music to marketers’ ears, “Video and audio also create new ad inventory and cross-platform ad opportunities,” Rosenstiel notes.
This is not really surprising. We hear all the time about short attention spans, and that even 15-second messages are too long. That's if you're selling crap, or selling in a crappy way. Because at the same time, consumer binge-watch years' worth of content in single, bleary-eyed sittings. And then brag about it.
Long-form, in-depth stories, well told, can hold viewers' attention. However, when I see things like, "new ad inventory and cross-platform ad opportunties," I shudder to think how these opportunities will get fucked up.