Commentary

Smart Jacket Connects Wearer With Special Deals

While Internet-connected things have ranged from phones and watches to thermostats and appliances, connections are now expanding to clothing.

Here comes the smart jacket.

The limited edition ‘BRIGHT BMBR’ smart jacket is being introduced by New York fashion brand Rochambeau and comes with an NFC chip and personalized QR code …

7 comments about "Smart Jacket Connects Wearer With Special Deals".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Douglas Ferguson from College of Charleston, October 31, 2016 at 9:34 a.m.

    And if you care about your privacy, you can simply opt not to wear one.

  2. Paula Lynn from Who Else Unlimited, October 31, 2016 at 10 a.m.

    Until it gets hacked and it will be.

  3. Chuck Martin from Chuck Martin replied, October 31, 2016 at 10:09 a.m.

    Valid point, Douglas. The owner also is not required to scan the tag in the sleeve, which starts the connecting process.

  4. Brian Prezgay from Pixels & Bricks, October 31, 2016 at 11:13 a.m.

    Everyone always wants to comment on our lack of privacy, yet we're upset when brands provide us with content that isn't relevant to us.  Millenials have been saying for a while now, I'm happy to give you my info so start talking to me like you know me.

    Privacy, or the lack of it, is baked into our thinking.  The experience now needs to improve and I applaud brands and tech companies for taking risks to test and learn to figure out what's relevant and what's not.

  5. Chuck Martin from Chuck Martin replied, October 31, 2016 at 11:20 a.m.

    Thanks, Brian. In this case, it is a limited trial to see what does (and doesn't) work in terms of value provided via the connected jacket. This matters, since millions of garments are coming with the ability to be 'connected.'

  6. Ed Papazian from Media Dynamics Inc, October 31, 2016 at 12:47 p.m.

    Smart jackets and, even cars are kid stuff. Wait until "they" organize the next frontier of "data"----- the "smart" bathroom.

  7. Chuck Martin from Chuck Martin replied, October 31, 2016 at 1:19 p.m.

    Sorry, Ed, that creation was already in the works years ago.

Next story loading loading..

Discover Our Publications