In a just released white paper from Covario, reporting on the Facebook health of 100 leading advertisers, Coca-Cola ranked the world’s No. 1 brand, with a following on Facebook of 34 million fans, growing at a monthly rate of nearly 3%, posting seven times a month, each garnering more than 235 comments and nearly 1,750 “likes.”
But importantly, the purpose of the White Paper is to develop a series of metrics and best practices for managing continuous improvement on the platform in order that global advertisers can measure how they are faring with their fans on the world’s largest social media platform.
Facebook users number 800 million as of the time of the writing, more than any other social media platform. Twitter is estimated at 245 million users and LinkedIn, the key professional social platform, 120 million users. Facebook is notable for a couple of key reasons.
Facebook users are “active” users, or using the system more than 4 times per week. Less than 40% of Twitter users are considered active users. Facebook counts nearly 50% of its user base as power users (use the site at least once per day). A study done by comScore last year showed that Facebook occupies nearly 10% of the user time online globally, but has expanded since this study. comScore reported in May of 2011 that users were spending an average of 450 minutes per month on the platform, compared to 230 minutes on Google.
To develop a measurement process, Covario considered first the advertisers’ goals for a social media program to establish a benchmark result.
Driving sales is the number one priority of advertisers with their social media programs in general, but a combined 47% see the goal as driving engagement and driving brand awareness, and another 14% say they are driving friends. Overall, then, says the report, 65% are using their social media programs, and their Facebook pages, to drive “soft” conversions, not explicit sales.
Goal of Social Media Program | |
Goal | % of Respondents, |
Driving sales | 35% |
Driving engagement | 24 |
Driving brand awareness | 23 |
Driving more “friends” to social sites | 14 |
Driving brand impressions | 4 |
Source: Covario,Inc, October 2011 |
Another benchmark evaluator, says the report, is the implicit importance based on the financial support of the program.
How Social Media Programs Are Financed Within Organization | |
Funding Through | % of Respondents |
Stand alone social media budget | 38% |
Search budget, paid or organic | 34 |
PR budget | 24 |
Display budget | 3 |
Source: Covario,Inc, October 2011 |
The most common method of a social page is a “fuzzy” association based on brand engagement and follower statistics that can be statistically correlated to online or total sales, or to brand awareness statistics. Two key statistics that are readily available from Facebook (and all social media platforms) are the data from building online followers and driving online engagement, and can be correlated to brand awareness statistics and econometric based conversion events as the overall data grows, according to the report.
To this end, Covario looked at four key factors: Reach, Engagement, Technical Construction, and Reputation, defined and weighted in the final metrics for measurement:
Key Factors For Social Media Success Measurement | ||
Factor | Definition | Weighting |
Reach | Number of followers; Growth of followers | 40% |
Engagement | Number of monthly posts; Likes; Comments; Applications posted | 30% |
Technical | Brand name in title; Brand name in URL; Name in description; Connection from home page; Use of word “official;” Presentation in Facebook search | 20% |
Reputation | Number of negative user sites in Facebook search | 10% |
Source: Covario,Inc, October 2011 |
This 4 tier scoring methodology leverages all publicly available information. So advertisers can use this to measure their own success, and benchmark performance against competition:
Using this proprietary, weighted model to profile each brand’s reach, engagement technical aspects of its Facebook page, and reputation, the top scoring 25 companies are shown here.
Top 25 Social Media Advertisers in Covario Scoring Model | |||||
Brand | Facebook Health Score | Reach | Engagement | Technical Structure | Reputation |
Coca-Cola | 100 | 52 | 30 | 58 | 100 |
Hyundai | 98 | 51 | 19 | 83 | 100 |
MTV | 88 | 43 | 10 | 100 | 100 |
Disney | 76 | 43 | 38 | 83 | 38 |
Bayer | 73 | 27 | 8 | 100 | 100 |
HP | 71 | 22 | 18 | 83 | 100 |
Victoria’s Secret | 71 | 24 | 14 | 83 | 100 |
Best Buy | 70 | 22 | 19 | 100 | 88 |
Samsung Mobile | 70 | 16 | 18 | 100 | 100 |
Dr. Pepper | 66 | 17 | 31 | 67 | 88 |
Macy’s | 66 | 15 | 15 | 92 | 100 |
Neutrogena | 65 | 18 | 8 | 100 | 100 |
DirecTV | 64 | 22 | 17 | 100 | 75 |
Scrubbing Bubbles | 64 | 20 | 3 | 100 | 100 |
HBO | 62 | 11 | 18 | 83 | 100 |
Wendy’s | 60 | 6 | 17 | 100 | 100 |
Apollo Group | 60 | 14 | 17 | 67 | 100 |
Reckitt Benckiser | 59 | 8 | 13 | 100 | 100 |
Pfizer | 59 | 14 | 10 | 83 | 100 |
CVS | 59 | 5 | 16 | 100 | 100 |
Sony | 59 | 5 | 17 | 100 | 100 |
Subway | 57 | 13 | 10 | 100 | 88 |
Hershey’s | 55 | 8 | 14 | 75 | 100 |
Chevrolet | 55 | 8 | 12 | 83 | 100 |
Nike | 55 | 10 | 9 | 83 | 100 |
Source: Covario,Inc, October 2011 |
The white paper concludes with insights for driving Facebook interaction and engagement.
Complete study findings, further insights, and the research methodology are available in a complementary white paper, which can be downloaded from the Covario website here, or sign in for the paper here.
Thanks for the great research review Jack. It's very insightful.
However, I do have a problem with the white paper insight "Quality is measured by the number of “likes” and comments received per post..."
I don't think the number of "likes" is as important as the percentage of friends who engage in the post.
Oversimplified, if Brand X has 100 friends and post an update, and only 1 of them "like" it, then that's a 1% engagement rate.
Conversely, if Coca-Cola posts an update and of 34 million friends, only 1,985 (from above) of them engage, then that's a 0.01% engagement rate.
Sure, Coke has more individuals interacting, but Brand X has a higher percentage of friends engaged. It's all relative.
Curious to get thoughts from others.
Brad