Pay
TV cord-cutting is still on the rise.
Some 6.5% of U.S. homes in 2013 -- 7.6 million homes -- are cord-cutters, according to a new study by Experian Marketing Services. This is up from 4.5%
-- or 5.1 million homes -- in 2010.
Experian defines cord-cutting as homes that have high-speed Internet but no cable or satellite television service. According to Nielsen’s 2014
estimates, there are 115.6 million U.S. TV homes and 294 million TV viewers age 2 and older.
The results also indicate that adults under the age of 35 are twice as likely not to have a pay
TV service -- 12.4% of those households where an adult under the age of 35 lives are cord-cutters. Experian says these young adults may not be necessarily be defined as “cord-cutters”
because they may never have had a pay TV service.
When you factor in those young adult homes with either a Netflix or Hulu account, Experian says, the share of young adult households that
don’t have a pay TV service jumps to 24.3%.
The results also reveal that adults who watch video on either a tablet or smartphone are 1.5 times more likely than average to be
cord-cutters. Those who watch streaming video on a television are 3.2 times more likely to be cable-cutters.
Adding to this category, the study says those using television primarily for
watching streaming or downloaded video are 5.7 times more likely to be cord-cutters.
The data is drawn from a Simmons Connect study of 24,219 U.S. adults in summer 2013, which looked at
consumer lifestyles, attitudes, brand preferences and cross-platform media use covering 11 platforms, including smartphones, digital tablets and home computers. The report also sources data from
Hitwise for online consumer behavior.
"Watching TV on Tablet" photo from Shutterstock.advertisement
advertisement
Not sure how these numbers-- which are based on a survey-- stack up with other numbers that show total pay TV households shrunk by only 0.2% in 2013.
Someone's numbers are off.
Thoughts?
Now that I am moving I had to cancel my DirecTV account, I did not consider that it cost me over a thousand plus dollars a year, after the move I don't think I will be returning...
Age can play a part in pay-TV's appeal, according to Forrester Research. While only 6% of all online adults have cut the cord in favor of Net-delivered video, the amount of cord cutters rose to 10% when results were narrowed to 18-to-24-year-olds.
anaheim bee removal
Imagine the future of getting your HBO an ESPN for $16 only plus internet which comes from your Phone. That is the scariest thought for cable. Its even worse for Satellite. With so many channels now looking for a home to show their content its growing a new market of users who see no need in keeping the cord attached. This will be payback for the phone companies who are pissed that the cable companies went into the phone businesses. Tvonthego.com
Interesting that their definition probably includes a rather large load of non-cord cutters. We should remember that cable TV rejectors have always been primarily the high value, high education households. So their title looks like a lie. Haven't been able to look seriously at the study to ensure that the data is correct.
Alan Wolk's comment is absolutely right. Consumers consistently say in surveys that they will cut the cord... then consistently fail to follow through. I was saying in a meeting just yesterday that cable companies have identified the magical price point at which everyone hates, yet everyone continues to pay their monthly bill.
The numbers seem wrong -- all 115.6M HHD has broadband internet? If not, you won't get the 6.5% figure. I think only about 86M HHD has broadband in the US, making the "cordcutting" percentage higher at almost 9%.
When I stated that after moving, I may not return to DirecTV, I should have added that of the hundred or so stations available I only watched six or seven, talk about over kill...