According to a new study by Nielsen, commissioned by inPowered and entitled The Role of the Consumer in the Decision Making Process, consumers report an increase in usage across all sources of information in the past five years, including sources such as brand websites, user reviews, and third party expert content, when learning more about new products and services. The ability to easily access information from a variety of sources has fundamentally changed the way consumers research products and, ultimately, make purchase decisions.
Results of the study show that expert content (credible, third-party articles and reviews) is the most effective source of information in impacting consumers along all stages of the purchase process, across product categories.
Information Source Usage In The Consumer Decision Process | ||
Information Source | % of Respondents Using | |
| Use Less | Use More |
Social media | 10% | 54% |
User reviews | 11 | 52 |
Online advertising | 11 | 51 |
Expert reviews | 11 | 46 |
Word of mouth | 10 | 45 |
Official brand websites | 13 | 44 |
TV advertising | 15 | 40 |
Radio advertising | 24 | 29 |
Source: Nielsen/inPowered study, March 2014 |
To evaluate the impact of expert content and branded content online and its role in the purchase process, an experimental design was used to expose consumers to content and then measure the impact of that content in creating product awareness/familiarity, influencing perceptions and increasing purchase consideration.
A controlled-lab setting was critical, says the report, as the amount of information to be digested was such that it introduced the possibility that respondents would not fully read the content or information provided if exposed in an unsupervised testing environment. The Nielsen MediaLabs facility draws from a nationally-representative population, and is the only lab facility to offer in-lab testing without relying only on locally recruited respondents. These advantages were conducive to increasing the reliability and projectability of the research findings.
Content was classified as one of three content types: expert content, user reviews, and branded content.
An at-a-glance summary of the experiment results shows that, while each content type had some success at increasing product familiarity, affinity, and purchase intent, content written by credible experts performed best overall.
Expert content was the only content type to exhibit a strong lift in all 3 areas of the purchase cycle. It provided the most familiarity lift for 7 out of the 9 products, the most affinity lift for 5 of the 9 products, and the most purchase intent lift for 6 of the 9 products.
On average, expert content lifted familiarity 88% more than branded content and 50% more than user reviews; they lifted affinity 50% more than branded content and 20% more than user reviews; finally, they lifted purchase consideration 38% more than branded content and 83% more than user reviews.
Positive Lift Percentage From Exposure to Expert Content | |||
| Lift | ||
Product | Familiarity | Affinity | Purchase Consideration |
Smartphone | 22% | 13% | 16% |
Smart TV | 8 | 6 | 7 |
Video Game | 30 | 22 | 11 |
Car Seat | 28 | 19 | 14 |
Electric Toothbrush | 3 | 12 | 9 |
Dryer | 18 | 10 | 16 |
New Automobile | 6 | 4 | 15 |
Auto Insurance | 3 | 6 | 5 |
Camera | 19 | 12 | 6 |
Source: Nielsen/inPowered study, March 2014 |
Positive Lift Percentage From Exposure to User Reviews | |||
Product | Lift | ||
| Familiarity | Affinity | Purchase Consideration |
Smartphone | 9% | 6% | 2% |
Smart TV | 1 | 9 | 4 |
Video Game | 25 | 28 | 20 |
Car Seat | 11 | 16 | 19 |
Electric Toothbrush | 2 | 16 | 0 |
Dryer | 21 | 9 | 0 |
New Automobile | 4 | 0 | 8 |
Auto Insurance | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Camera | 11 | 6 | 6 |
Source: Nielsen/inPowered study, March 2014 |
Positive Lift Percentage From Exposure to Branded Content | |||
Product | Lift | ||
| Familiarity | Affinity | Purchase Consideration |
Smartphone | 7% | 10% | 13% |
Smart TV | 0 | 7 | 0 |
Video Game | 17 | 3 | 12 |
Car Seat | 19 | 15 | 16 |
Electric Toothbrush | 11 | 10 | 7 |
Dryer | 10 | 12 | 9 |
New Automobile | 6 | 2 | 4 |
Auto Insurance | 0 | 4 | 1 |
Camera | 16 | 12 | 12 |
Source: Nielsen/inPowered study, March 2014 |
Two key differentiators help to explain why expert content was the only type that exhibited this strong lift across all three areas of the purchase funnel, says the report. The perceived partiality of the source was especially critical in setting expert content and branded content apart. The third-party element was important to consumers: 50% indicated that they wouldn’t trust a product’s branded website for an unbiased assessment of a product, and 61% were less likely to trust product reviews paid for by the company selling the product.
The other key differentiator was how informative the respondents perceived the content to be. Consumers perceived expert content to be 10% and 8% more informative than both user content and branded content respectively. Thus, expert content’s ability to provide the greatest breadth and variety of information compared to branded and user content, combined with a perspective that it was perceived as unbiased, appears to be driving its consistently high performance in all areas of the purchase process.
Impact Of Content Types Across Purchase Process | |||
Information Source | Purchase Consideration | Affinity | Familiarity |
User reviews | 6% | 10% | 10% |
Branded content | 8% | 8% | 8% |
Expert content | 11% | 12% | 15% |
Source: Nielsen/inPowered study, March 2014 |
Expert Content Effectiveness
Purchase Consideration
+ 83% Vs. User Reviews
+38% Vs. Branded Content
Affinity
+20% Vs. User Reviews
+50% Vs. Branded Content
Familiarity
+50% Vs. User Reviews
+88% Vs. Branded Content
Source: Nielsen/inPowered study, March 2014
While user reviews and branded content did not exhibit the same pattern of consistency in performance across all categories and phases of the purchase cycle that was observed with expert content, there were instances where their impact was strongest. With branded content, for example, lift was strongest with categories where product specs were a critical part of the part of the decision making process. And, user reviews were found to be successful in categories where users tend to have a higher degree of product expertise.
Expert content was most effective at influencing high price point purchases (i.e. $1,000+). It is important to note that branded content was effective at driving familiarity and affinity for big ticket purchases, but it was not as effective at persuading purchase consideration. User reviews had even less relevance for these types of purchases. Ultimately, expert content influenced all three phases and was most effective at driving final purchase consideration. The higher the price point, the more efficient expert content was in educating and persuading consumers.
Content Impact On High-Priced Items | |||
Brand Impact: High-Priced Items (Index) | Expert Content | User Reviews | Branded content |
Familiarity Lift | 122 | 33 | 144 |
Affinity Lift | 153 | 47 | 127 |
Purchase Intent Lift | 186 | 57 | 57 |
Source: Nielsen/inPowered study, March 2014 |
Concluding, the report pointed out that, overall, the research indicates that there is a higher degree of trust from consumers when they are reading content from credible, third party experts. This trust is demonstrated by the higher lift scores with regard to product familiarity, affinity and purchase intent and its perception of being highly informative and unbiased. This trust further suggests that expert content is more efficient at pushing consumers along the consumer decision-making process because it is more effective at consistently lifting these measures across each phase of the purchase process.
In the end, says the report, the impact of expert content on consumer decision making demonstrates the important role that objective and credible information from trusted sources play in the purchase process.
For additional information about the study from Nielsen in PDF format, please visit here.