A new white paper from The CMO Club in partnership with MediaMath makes the point that CMOs are increasingly adopting a programmatic marketing mindset vs. a programmatic advertising one.
What does that mean?
The paper suggests that while programmatic media buying has been around for nearly a decade, marketers have yet to reach its full potential. Programmatic media can be tapped for 100% of media budgets and used to enable more sophisticated audience management and analytics. In other words, it's much more than a mere line item on media plans.
The white paper defined programmatic as that which “leverages technology to automate and optimize the planning, purchasing, execution and analysis of digital marketing across channels, [and] is empowering CMOs to connect their technology decisions with real business results.”
The growing convergence of ad and marketing tech, driven by automated systems on both sides of the equation, plus the cornucopia of available data, has the ability to make ads more targeted across paid and owned media. Marketers and publishers need to expand their range of vision where programmatic is concerned to include more channels and functions.
“The future of programmatic is looking at other mediums. Currently, programmatic is being used in video and mobile, but TV is just dabbling in this space. What about the Internet of Things?” asked Sean Cheyney, VP, audience extension sales, Triad Retail Media.
Thinking about programmatic marketing more broadly requires the ability to incorporate programmatic best practices across a brand’s entire marketing strategy, the white paper notes. That's a sensible approach. Integrating programmatic strategies makes sense throughout the entire media planning process.
While agencies can serve as the lead partner with brands on programmatic, they also need to connect clients to the best media buying, data management and measurement approaches across different channels. Frequently, these approaches are actually vendors in their own “preferred partner” network, but agencies need to facilitate other relationships where they make sense to ensure brands have all the right partners in place. This is where an agency can add more value, since the converging ad-tech and mar-tech landscape is such a confusing jumble—the technology itself changes week-to-week, product offerings are constantly iterating and partnerships are multiplying.
“CMOs and agencies need to be on the same page for a successful partnership to work," Cheyney told RTBlog via email. "Programmatic can help advance business and marketing objectives, but in order for it to work it needs to be part of the strategy, not just be a tactic."
Cheyney said that CMOs are relying even more on agency partners to help make sense of data. "Agencies are most effective when they can help their partners understand how to harness the data to drive business objectives. Agencies that understand programmatic and its place within the overall advertising strategy can be a critical asset for CMOs," he said.
Taking a slightly different view, Matt Nespoli, digital media supervisor at Butler/Till, stated: “The agency of the future is going to be full of consultants. They will be strategic thinkers and bring new technologies and approaches to their clients. When you’re not always in the weeds, you can think more strategically—and that’s why agencies will always be around. We’re doing this and finding ourselves in that consultative role, which allows us to be proactive instead of reactive.”
The survey of more than 70 CMOs at brands and agencies revealed that marketers still want to work with their agencies on programmatic strategies, but they want to approach things differently. Brands are leaning on their agencies and ad-tech/mar-tech vendors to interact with one another and have a relationship.
Among the findings:
The findings revealed that 70% of CMOs surveyed ranked the partnership between marketing technology providers and agencies as "very important" to their success. Marketers’ embrace of programmatic has created a new dynamic between brands and agencies.
Tobi, while many of the points raised seem valid for direct marketing and related campaigns I have a problem seeing how they apply to many pure branding efforts. A typical TV branding campaign attempts to create brand and ad message awareness, plus buying motivation, among a fairly wide spectrum of likely targets, not merely a narrow segment of recent buyers as defined by "data". Such campaigns are developed with a fair amount of research to guide them and their results are tracked, not consumer by consumer, but in their totality---awareness by demos or mindset groupings and, of course,overall sales. How would "programmat, which I take to mean an attribution-based, "data" approach, fit in?
As regards the accepted use of programmatic in media, here too, we are talking almost exclusively about digital media, which is a small portion of a typical branding campaign's media budget---despite those huge ad revenue numbers we keep reading about.
I guess my point is this. In many of these articles---including well written and interesting ones like yours----we omit the distinction between branding and direct marketing campaigns, as if they all operate on the same principles and require the same metrics. Maybe they should be better coordiated, however, in practice, this is often not the case---not yet anyway. Whether a "programmatic" way of thinking will be the "solution" is anyone's guess.
I question the wisdom of letting agencies take the lead in media buying. If your budget is fairly evenly balanced between B2B & B2C, they can be trusted to do a thorough analysis. But if the budget is heavily skewed one way or the other, they'll give short shrift to the lesser side.
Shucks, I misspelled "programmatic" at the close of my first paragraph.